Letter: Privatisation and efficiency in the prison service
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report on law and order privatisation (24 August) hit a timely note for lecturers working in the prison education service. On Friday the Home Office issued notices of competitive tender for the education service, opening it up to all comers.
As your report indicates, this move has little to do with rational provision of the service and everything to do with an ideologically inspired belief that 'private is best'. It is a contention that, in the hyper-sensitive area of prison life, must surely be open to question.
Prison education plays a vital role in prison life. To reduce it to a crude notion of 'market testing' is to undervalue the importance of education in promoting rehabilitation and humanising the prison experience.
The Council of Europe stresses that education for prisoners should be at least of the quality of good adult education in society. The main providers of post-school education in the community are further education colleges, and prison education provided through the colleges offers compatibility, quality and the benefit of experienced and sensitive staff.
The Home Office announcement on competitive tendering has meant many staff are now working under the threat of redundancy or non-renewal of contract. While logic dictates that further education colleges are the best providers of high quality prison education, staff in the service are facing disruption, turmoil, and serious loss of morale. It seems a curious way to promote 'efficiency' in the prison service.
Yours sincerely,
GEOFF WOOLF
General Secretary
National Association of Teachers
in Further and Higher Education
London, WC1
25 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments