Letter: Private provision not needed to defuse the pensions 'time bomb'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Avner Offer
Sir: Hamish McRae writes ("Now we can see how old age looks", 24 January):
I do not think we trust governments sufficiently to give them more of our money.
I agree. But do we trust private pension providers any more than the Government? The recent records of some of them are just as bad.
Dependence on the private sector is not the same as self-reliance. We do not have sufficient information to select a private provider. Once we make our choice, we become its captives. And if government is to guarantee our private pensions, then we are in the hands of government once again, and private providers have even greater licence to take liberties with our money.
The problem of old age provision is even more difficult than it seems.
Yours sincerely,
Avner Offer
Reader in Recent Social
and Economic History
Nuffield College
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments