Letter: Price to pay for closing the Commonwealth Institute

Mr John Chadwick
Monday 08 November 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In May the Queen launched the centenary celebrations of the Commonwealth Institute from its headquarters in Kensington. She then said:

The Institute brings the reality of the individual countries of the Commonwealth alive and demonstrates the role the Commonwealth can play in the world and among its own members . . . the Institute's work in education is a constant reminder throughout our school system of the realities and values of today's Commonwealth . . .

Two months later a motion in the Commons, lending support to the Institute's work in the educational field, was signed by 132 MPs. Undeterred, the Government later announced that, as from 1996, Britain would be axing her pounds 2.7m funding grant to the Institute. This news was received with dismay in educational and cultural quarters throughout the Commonwealth.

May I, in the aftermath of the recent Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Cyprus, where delegations again expressed Commonwealth-wide dismay at the British decision, add my small plaint? I do so as a long-since retired governor of the Institute - a post held by virtue of having been Director of the Commonwealth Foundation. While this is financed by all Commonwealth countries, and the Institute by Britain alone, both organisations have co-operated fruitfully in projects covering the broad educational and professional fields; in the arts, music, applied sciences and technology, both in Britain and throughout the Commonwealth.

The Foundations's annual grant-making income rises steadily to the modest benefit of professionals throughout the Commonwealth. But what of the Institute? Are we to throw away this valuable centre, with its extensive programmes of activities, resources and facilities for British schools, professionals and the British public itself? Is pounds 2.7m a year too high a price to pay for the role which the Institute can and should still play in the educational and cultural fields across the Commonwealth - not least in a now seemingly reluctant Britain?

Yours etc,

JOHN CHADWICK

Kingston,

Surrey

5 November

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in