Letter: Press regulation: a Bill killed, tragic revelations, the global village, sellers of sleaze
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Government and others can agitate for laws to muzzle the press but they have been overtaken by technology. Any laws promulgated in Britain could be bypassed easily. There is, for instance, nothing to stop someone - say, Rupert Murdoch - from broadcasting into Britain via satellite from New York. He could then carry what he liked on that channel subject only to the constraints of American law - which, as we all know, has a liberal approach to press freedom, thanks to the First Amendment to that nation's written constitution.
How would the British government try to stop it? Jam broadcasts? Ban possession of satellite dishes? Or would it simply bow to the inevitable and realise, finally, that Marshall McLuhan's global village makes a nonsense of repressive media laws?
Yours sincerely,
NOEL CASHMORE
Bexhill, East Sussex
14 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments