Letter: Pregnant servicewomen
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I am writing to refute a point in your article (6 April) concerning pregnant servicewomen.
I can confirm that the 'express intention of avoiding the creation of orphans' was not the reason for the policy of discharging pregnant servicewomen. Prior to 1990, it had been the long-standing policy of the services to discharge women when they became pregnant, as pregnancy was considered incompatible with service life, particularly given the need for personnel to serve around the world, sometimes in arduous conditions. For virtually all of this period women were not serving in the front line and were not therefore exposed to the increased risks that such service can attract.
It is only since 1989 that women have had the opportunity to serve in combat roles, thereby increasing the risks that they face. Since 1990, however, it has been possible for those servicewomen who have become pregnant to take a period of maternity leave, should they not wish to leave the service, returning to duty after the birth of their children. Servicewomen with children are of course expected to continue to meet their full range of duties.
Yours faithfully,
JEREMY HANLEY
Minister of State for the Armed Forces
Ministry of Defence
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments