Letter: Precipitate action on Pill
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Brian G. Hands
Sir: I wish to express my disquiet about the way the Secretary of State for Health handled the withdrawal of the "dangerous" oral contraceptives.
There was no need to precipitate anxieties bordering on hysteria by asking women to present to their GPs in their current month's supply, thus suggesting that there was a degree of urgency. A large number of women have been on these pills for a considerable number of years and it would have been reasonable to advise them to see their GPs as their renewals became due. It is also debatable whether one should act on unpublished data.
On the other hand, there is a good deal of published data to suggest that older antidepressants have a dreadful incidence of fatality in overdose as compared with the newer. This is far greater than the increased thrombosis risk with any oral contraceptives but there has been no attempt to blacklist the dangerous older drugs. The cost of the newer drugs is about 10 times greater than that of the older.
As there has not been a similar move to ban the more dangerous cheap drugs, perhaps the cynics who say the oral contraceptive bans have a cost- saving element (about pounds 25m) do have a point.
Yours sincerely,
Brian G. Hands
Willington, Derbyshire
23 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments