Letter: PR: voters or rubber stamps?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PR: voters or rubber stamps?
Sir: The Home Secretary, Jack Straw, has announced that "time will be found for legislation this session which will allow the next European Elections to be held using a system of PR."
This is to be welcomed as a positive step, giving the British electorate a greater say. The details of the system are yet to be announced; what is now important is whether the voter is going to be given a choice between candidates of a party or is simply going to be asked to rubber-stamp a closed party list.
The Government has a great opportunity to live up to its language about openness, pluralism and new politics. They can do this by ensuring that the final say over who is elected for a political party rests not with the party, but with the electorate, where it belongs.
There are a number of ways this can be achieved, but the best and most cost-effective would be to extend the proportional system (STV) already used in Northern Ireland for elections to the European Parliament to the rest of the United Kingdom. This would give voters a true choice between candidates and parties.
PETER FACEY
Development Officer
Electoral Reform Society
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments