Letter: Powerless even to anchor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your three correspondents (12 January) rightly refer to the use of a ship's anchors when 'not under command' and drifting towards a coast. The Braer, when south of the Shetlands in a southerly storm and with a failed engine room, may not have been in a situation to cope with anchoring.
At three miles south of Sumburgh Head, the sea depth averages 50 fathoms (bottom extensively rock). The Braer would be equipped with several hundred fathoms of anchor cable on each anchor, but letting go anchor in this depth would require power on the anchor windlass, and presumably such power was not available.
A further aspect could be that with full cargo, deep on her marks, the deck area and windlass gear up in the bows was being swept with water considerably heavier than spray, putting at risk any crew manning the windlass.
Yours faithfully,
IAN FORSYTH
Ardnadam, Argyll
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments