Letter: Power to the parishes, and the flying bishops
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Episcopal power does not depend upon financial weight, as stated in your leader of Ash Wednesday ('Vicars fed from the collection plate', 16 February). If bishops were free from the burden of administering a whole range of diocesan and synodical boards, organisations and committees, then they could begin to offer the kind of leadership you ask for to the church and country.
Diocesan organisations, run by numerous full- and part-time paid staff, absorb an increasingly unwelcome part of a parish's resources, especially when many of the services are unnecessary or can be provided within the community at large. They also absorb episcopal energy and vision.
Andrew Brown's article ('Parishes to pay price of church property debacle', 16 February) highlights a need for diocesan economy in addition to increased giving by the laity.
The clergy in Durham receive the minimum stipend of pounds 12,200, plus a free house, which is partly funded by the Church Commissioners. The 'poor parish' of St Giles, which he cites, already gives pounds 14,400 to the diocese.
Why then the 50 per cent increase demanded by the bishop? Is it because a bishop's 'weight' appears to be measured by the size of his ecclesiastical empire - surely a mistake in Bishop Jenkins's case]
More giving would surely come from church people if it were seen to be for the benefit of the local parish church and clergy.
Frank Field is correct ('Dear Dr Carey', 16 February) in seeing the influence of the Church of England as stemming from the parochial system and foreseeing the danger that the present crisis will undermine its influence further. By all means let us reform the workings of the Church Commissioners and the General Synod, but also let us prune the pretensions of the dioceses, give power back to the parishes and influence to our bishops.
Yours sincerely,
DONALD SHEPHERD
Rector,
Langtree Team Ministry
Checkendon,
Reading
16 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments