LETTER: Power to the House of Lords: Enoch's dilemma
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr J. R. Lucas
Sir: However we reform the composition of the Lords ("Should be change the rules of this club?", 9 May), Enoch Powell's dilemma remains insoluble. If we give the House of Lords too little power, it will not be able to protect us from misbehaviour on the part of the House of Commons (something we very much need), but if we give the House of Lords enough power to protect us, then it will have too much power for ordinary political purposes, and deadlock between the two chambers will become part of the political process, as in the US.
We need to rethink the powers of the Second Chamber in case of serious conflict. In the present age, the one solution commanding democratic authority would be a referendum. Each House would present its version of the disputed measure (which might be just to maintain the status quo), and voters would have to choose between them.
Each House would have a strong incentive to seem to be reasonable. Yet in cases of urgency, the Government could have its legislation enacted without delay. The composition of the House of Lords could be improved without fear of its being able unreasonably to obstruct the Commons. And in cases of dispute, the final verdict would be unimpeachable and have greater authority than could be obtained in any other way.
Yours faithfully,
J. R. LUCAS
East Lambrook, Somerset
9 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments