LETTER: POSSIBLE BENEFITS OF VIRGINIA BOTTOMLEY'S HEALTH REFORMS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Paula Jones
Sir: In today's Independent the Secretary of State for Health is quoted ("Bottomley gets mauling over hospital cuts", 6 April) as saying that "to allow the services to fossilise is not going to address the real needs". Quite so.
Why then the continued and rising outcry about change? The simple answer is that the strength of feeling in London is rooted in the daily experience of patients who are not getting the care they need, because the scale and pace of change are undermining service delivery. Older people especially will be asking themselves why they are so unimportant compared with an apparently immutable plan which has their well-being as one of its declared aims.
The proportion of frail elderly people in London is rising. They are uniquely dependent on a balance of provision between hospital care and primary and community services. There is evidence of a significant rise in hospital admissions for elderly patients, accompanied by an equally significant drop in the average length of stay. Whatever the reasons for these changes, one conclusion is clear: primary and community services are the key to the continuing health care of older people.
There are indications that packages of care arranged for elderly patients discharged from hospital are becoming vulnerable to breakdown. This is but one symptom of the stresses affecting services and patients in the capital.
Few informed observers have questioned the need for health services reform in London, though many have challenged its basis. Most have repeatedly stressed the absolute need for the management of change to be geared to the needs of patients. It is bitterly disappointing to know that this message has yet to be heard.
Yours faithfully,
PAULA JONES
Director
Age Concern
London, SE5
6 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments