Letter: Positive bias

Muriel Brook
Sunday 05 October 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I have been a member of Mencap for over 40 years but I think that in recent years the executive have lost their way. Your report "Mencap battles to combat bias" (4 October) makes me despair. Mencap's chief executive, Fred Hoddell, says: "People with learning disabilities are discriminated against in employment, when on holiday, through leisure and with a variety of services such as housing, the NHS and the criminal justice system."

Discrimination is appropriate and necessary in the interests of many people with a mental handicap. For example, my 45-year-old son has the mental age of a three-year-old: he cannot speak, he has some neurological impairment, his behaviour can be very erratic and challenging. To satisfy his needs requires discrimination in a manner that is not appropriate for his normal siblings. There are many thousands like him.

There is a world of difference between handicapped people and the larger number whose disability is relatively slight. The World Health Organisation classification of a number of learning disabilities specifically excludes conditions which are attributable to mental retardation. I am not surprised that 50 per cent of the public use the term "mentally handicapped". I find that groups of parents and relatives usually use the term just because it is more precise and not euphemistic. Changing names does not change reality.

MURIEL BROOK

Dorking, Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in