Letter: Poor maths results add up
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: So, the International Maths and Science Study shows English teenagers perform poorly in mathematics (report, 16 November). Before everyone jumps to the conclusion that it is teaching methods - and, by implication, teachers - that are to blame, might I suggest a long, hard look at the content of the national curriculum for mathematics?
Many years BC (Before the Curriculum), the majority of the maths syllabus was taken up by number and algebra, and statistical topics were hardly mentioned. The national curriculum made data-handling into first one quarter and now one third of the syllabus, with number and algebra squashed into one third between them.
Now England comes bottom of nine industrialised countries in number and algebra. The only thing that puzzles me is why anyone should be at all surprised.
MARY JONES
Exeter
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments