Letter: Polluters' disposal well below legal levels

Mr Guy Liardet
Sunday 26 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I refer to the article by Nicholas Schoon ('Pressure group names top 100 legal polluters', 24 July) concerning the consented levels of industrial discharges to sewage plant treatment. The 'top polluter' figure for Ectona Fibres is in fact the result of a bureaucratic error which doubles their consent to 68,000 cubic metres per day; they actually discharge 850 cubic metres with a concentration of 1mg/litre, 800 times less than their permit. All these facts are available at the price of a telephone call; Friends of the Earth's accusations of secrecy are misplaced.

This industry is only too pleased to have these issues debated in public. We are anxious to create dialogues with environmentalist groups as we have the same aims and a remarkable record of improvements in environmental performance. We can help them to design a much-needed adjustment to their strategies for the complex conditions of the 1990s; an adversarial relationship with industry and attacks on the easy but fast-reducing target of industrial pollution are not appropriate ways to proceed.

Yours faithfully,

GUY LIARDET

Director

Chemical Industries Association

London, SW1

24 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in