LETTER : Political asylum does not permit propaganda campaigns

Mr Randhir Singh
Sunday 07 January 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Randhir Singh Bains

Sir: Your leading article on Saudi deportation states that "all Mr Masari has done is engage in a peaceful campaign against a medieval, absolutist monarchy". While Mr Masari may not have been directly involved in violent activities directed against the Saudi government, his London-based Committee for the Defence of Legitimate Rights appeared to condone last year's bomb attack on an American building in Riyadh.

However, in attempting to condemn his deportation, one only needs to defend the principle of asylum, not the man at the centre of controversy. Indeed the Government did exactly that when, a few years ago, it refused to deport the Sikh separatist leader Jagjit Singh Chohan to India, or the MQM leader Altaf Hussain to Pakistan, although both of them were accused of instigating terrorism in their countries of origin.

But now, by ordering the deportation of Mr Masari at the behest of Saudi regime, the Government has not only exposed itself to the charge of following double-standards but has also set a dangerous precedent for rendering Britain's asylum laws amenable to external pressure.

Yours faithfully,

Randhir Singh Bains,

Gants Hill, Essex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in