Letter: Policy on NHS charges unchanged
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The draft guidance on continuing care issued by the Department of Health for consultation on Friday was not, as your report 'Cradle to grave NHS buried by Government' (13 August) suggests, abandoning any national guarantees for patients. Rather it was confirming the judgement of the Health Commissioner in the Leeds case that the National Health Service continues to have responsibility for people's medical needs 'from the cradle to the grave' and that such treatments will continue to be free. Local health authorities will decide how - and not whether - such needs should be met.
Once the medical needs of a patient have been confirmed by the doctors involved as having been met, then there has never, of course, been a right to stay on in a hospital bed, which will be needed by other patients. Most people go home after hospital: some need a period, short or long, in residential care. If this is judged by doctors to be a medical need, then it will be paid for by the NHS. If it is a social care need, then it will be arranged by social services, which will pay for those on low incomes and ask for a contribution towards the cost from those who can afford it.
If someone does not wish to be placed in a residential home where there will be a charge, then he or she will continue to have the right not to be placed there and, instead, social services will see if a package of home care can be agreed.
In other words, no change is proposed in charging policy, no change is proposed in the responsibility of the NHS for medical care. Better and more open planning of services and a better understanding of their respective responsibilities by health and social service authorities are what, through this guidance, we are seeking.
Yours faithfully,
JOHN BOWIS
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State
Department of Health
London, SW1
13 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments