Letter: Persuasive effects of a good whacking
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Despite devoting much space to the tender topic of Michael Fay's impending caning (leading article and Section II front page, 18 April), you contrive to avoid addressing the one aspect of the case which is of any serious interest: will whacking work?
Such punishment is doubtless 'degrading' - it's supposed to be - but it's only 'inhuman' if it fails to persuade the recipient to mend his ways, in which case it becomes 'gratuitous violence'. Where are the statistics for recidivism vis-a-vis those flogged? Do they come back for a second dose?
If six-of-the-best is sufficient to deter the malefactor from further misbehaviour, then, rather than criticising the Singaporese, we should adopt the practice immediately. By this simple, cheap and efficent method Britain could reduce prison overcrowding and juvenile delinquency at a stroke, as it were.
Yours,
ANDREW MONTGOMERY
Ham, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments