LETTER:PCC complaint

Mr Mark Bolland
Tuesday 14 November 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Mark Bolland

Sir: I will not anticipate any possible conclusions that Lord Wakeham, chairman of the Press Complaints Commission, may reach about newspaper reporting of the Rosemary West trial - and in particular the issue of payments allegedly made to witnesses. But I must take issue with the comments about the PCC in your editorial "Keep cash out of the courts" (13 November).

You assert that the payment of witnesses in criminal proceedings violates the PCC's code of conduct. But it is not our Code of Practice: it is a code drafted by the newspaper industry. It is our responsibility to adjudicate on complaints made about possible breaches of the code - not to act as judge and jury, applying the rules as well as framing them.

Lord Wakeham is maintaining an extremely close eye on press reporting of the West trial and of allegations made about the conduct of newspapers. When we are in full possession of all the facts, then - and only then - will we be in a position to act, if indeed it is necessary for us to do so. The Independent really would have cause to complain if the industry's watchdog spoke first and thought later.

Yours faithfully,

Mark Bolland

Director

Press Complaints Commission

London, EC4

14 November

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in