Letter: Paying for pensions

Mr I. M. Aitken
Monday 19 April 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article 'Women's work is never done' (13 April) does not appear sympathetic to the Government's leaked proposal to increase women's state pension age from 60 to 65.

At present the ratio that people of working age bears to pensioners (the support ratio) is 3.4 to 1. If there is no change in state pension age the ratio will fall to 2.4 in 2030 as a consequence of the 'baby boom of the 1960s' retiring. Equalisation of pension ages at 65 will adjust the ratio to 3 to 1.

The state pension is financed on a pay-as-you-go system, which requires the working population to pay National Insurance contributions to provide pension to existing pensioners. With no change in pension age and with the support ratio decreasing from 3.4 to 2.4, this will require an increase in National Insurance contributions by some 30 per cent; this means the employers' contribution would increase from 10.4 per cent to approximately 13.5 per cent and the employees' from 9 per cent to 11.7 per cent. Are employers and employees prepared to pay these increased contributions?

Yours sincerely,

I. M. AITKEN

The Pensions Management Institute

London, E1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in