Letter: Pay review for armed forces
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In your article ('Armed forces review may axe pay grades', 15 February) you referred to the parliamentary question that I answered in the House on 9 February about our plans for a major independent review of service career and manpower structures and terms and conditions of service.
You went on to state what was not in my answer, that this review is part of the (and I quote) 'cost- saving 'Front Line First' scrutiny'. This conclusion is incorrect: the review of service career and manpower structures will not form part of the 'Front Line First' defence cost studies.
The review will need to take full account of developments that might flow from the individual defence costs studies which will be presented initially to ministers by April. But the aim of the independent review of service career and manpower structures and terms and conditions of service is not one of 'cost-cutting'. Our decision to undertake such a review is in recognition of the changes that have taken place in military commitments and deployment patterns.
Career and manpower structures need to take account of the ending of the Cold War and consequent changes in the pattern of deployment. The AFPRB commented in its 1994 report that the pay structure of the Armed Forces is over- complex and ripe for careful review. The Armed Forces Pension Scheme has not been examined in any detail since 1973. All this clearly points to the need for an independent review to ensure that we have arrangements which are appropriate to the early part of the 21st century.
The review is expected to last about a year, and this in itself clearly puts it outside the scope of the defence cost studies.
Yours faithfully,
JEREMY HANLEY
Minister of State for
the Armed Forces
Ministry of Defence
London, SW1
15 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments