Letter: Pay of NatWest chiefs

Simon D. Lewis
Saturday 30 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

RUPERT BRUCE'S claim that main NatWest board directors were awarded increases in salary of up to 40 per cent on 1 April is factually incorrect ('NatWest chiefs get huge rises as staff are cut', Business, 24 April). The largest increase received by an executive director was the increase of 16.9 per cent in the remuneration of Derek Wanless, our Group Chief Executive.

Your article is based on a misreading of the executive directors' contracts which your journalist reviewed at our offices on 22 April. The article compares individuals' new salaries, which include directors' fees, territorial allowances, market supplements and basic salary, with basic salaries as at 1 April 1992. It totally overlooks the year-on-year comparison with 1993.

To provide a proper comparison, it is necessary to compare basic salary plus fees, allowances and supplements, as at 1 March 1994 with the new salaries effective from 1 April 1994. On this basis, the average increase is 10.7 per cent.

You refer specifically to the remuneration of John Melbourn and claim that he 'also got 40 per cent more'. In fact, as he was promoted to Deputy Group Chief Executive on 1 March 1994, he received an additional salary rise of 11.7 per cent on that appointment. Consequently, his overall salary increased by 23.4 per cent in the 12 months up to and including 1 April 1994.

Any increases in executive directors' remuneration are reviewed, against market comparisons, by the Remuneration Committee, which is made up of solely non-executive directors.

Simon D Lewis

Director of Corporate Affairs

National Westminster Bank

London EC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in