Letter: Patents unlock gene secrets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Patents unlock gene secrets
Sir: One thing that many commentators on the debate about genetic patenting (Letters, 14, 15, 16 July) appear to have missed: the reason why patents exist. In return for a time-limited period of protection, during which the patent holder has the sole right to exploit the invention, the inventor places the information about the invention into the public domain.
Those opposing the granting of gene patents should reflect on the fact that in 20 or so years' time, these patents will expire and then anyone will be able to use the technology. This is better than having the knowledge locked away unused, or kept commercially secret, or, worse still, never discovered in the first place because no funds are available for the basic research.
TONY FUELL
Executive Director
The British Institute of Regulatory Affairs
London E14
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments