Letter: Patents and cures for genetic disease

Mrs Ann Hunt
Wednesday 30 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: So why do those people whose bodies are potentially affected by genetic disease want tests and therapies? Because conventional medicine has had little to offer so far. And when did you last take a medicine that had not been commercially developed? Aromatherapy and herbal remedies spring to mind, but a visit to your local chemist will show that these also are now being manufactured by pharmaceutical companies. Doctors are naturally concerned about the cost of the tests to their restricted budgets, but realistically the alternative is no tests or therapies being developed at all.

They should be discussing now with the Department of Health how to provide these tests when they become available, not preventing their development.

I share and respect the misgivings many people have about the inevitable changes genetic research will bring to the way we think about life in moral, ethical and biological contexts. But for those who, like myself, watched a child or relative suffer and die when there was nothing present medicine could offer, regulation of future knowledge is what is wanted, not prohibition.

We do not wish to become regarded as an endangered sub-species, repeating the pain over generations, but we need the support of the rest of humanity to achieve this.

Mrs ANN HUNT

Tuberous Sclerosis Association

North Leigh

Oxfordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in