Letter: Patent cruelty to animals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The European Parliament's decision to allow animals to be classed as patentable inventions ("Europe gives green light to gene law", 17 July) could lead to huge increases in animal suffering.
If the proposed directive becomes law in its present form, patents on small animals will become readily available. The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) believes that this would provide a huge commercial incentive to animal genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is now the fastest growing area of animal experimentation, with 226,618 experiments being carried out on animals with "harmful genetic defects" in 1995.
Laboratory animals are genetically engineered to act as models of painful human diseases. Farm animals, already pushed beyond their natural limits, have been genetically engineered to grow quicker or bigger, and have suffered from ulcers, muscular weakness, poor vision and other disorders as a result. Additionally, genetically engineered animals may suffer from severe, even lethal, unpredicted side-effects.
The classification of animals as "patentable inventions" goes directly against the growing recognition of the inherent value and rights of animals. This was emphasised at the recent EU summit meeting in Amsterdam where a protocol to the Treaty of Rome classifying animals as "sentient beings" was adopted by all member states.
The Council of Ministers will now consider the proposed directive. We urge the Government to take this opportunity to press for a ban on all animal patents.
MIKE BAKER
Chief Executive
British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection
London N7
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments