LETTER: Passport over-control
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HUGH O'Shaughnessy may not be surprised to hear that the UK courts are unlikely to vindicate him if he were to complain about his troubles at the hands of London City Airport's immigration officials ("Hoping for a British defeat at the borders of insanity", 17 September).
In May 1993, Donald Flynntook a day trip from Dover to Calais. On his return he refused to produce his passport and was only admitted after being held for 40 minutes. He argued that Article 7a of the EC Treaty required member states of the European Union to abolish all frontier controls by the end of 1992 on the achievement of the internal market. This was rejected by the High Court in March and by the Court of Appeal which decided that Article 7a did not have "direct effect" and could not therefore be invoked by individuals.
The extent of the rights created by Article 8a of the EC Treaty, which provides every EU citizen with the right to move and reside freely within member states, was one of the questions referred by the High Court to the European Court of Justice in the case concerning the Home Secretary's exclusion of Gerry Adams from the UK. Following the revocation of the ban the case did not proceed, and the rights are still to be clarified.
Hugh O'Shaughnessy found trading rights to take precedence over the rights of ordinary citizens. The European Convention on Human Rights protects the rights to freedom of movement of some Europeans, but the UK government has failed to ratify the provisions upholding those rights. It has, however, ratified the right to "peaceful enjoyment of one's possessions".
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights also provides for a right of freedom of movement, but the UK still shies away from incorporating this into our law. The government was criticised for this by the UN Human Rights Committee.
Philip Leach
Liberty, London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments