LETTER : Parties rescued a VAT absurdity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: How exquisitely timed your leading article "The main parties need a deeper shade of green" is (12 March). On your news pages you report a heavy defeat for a backbench amendment to the Finance Bill, an amendment that would have - in the words of former Chancellor Norman Lamont in his 1993 Budget speech - removed "an anomaly which makes a nonsense of any attempt to use the tax system to assist the environment".
The anomaly in question is the patent absurdity of charging VAT on energy conservation materials at 17.5 per cent whilst levying it at 8 per cent on energy consumption. What is so depressing is that both Conservative and Labour front benches colluded to stop this distortion being rectified.
ANDREW WARREN
Director, Association for the Conservation of Energy
London N1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments