LETTER:Our battlefields are our heritage

Mr Michael Rayner
Thursday 13 July 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Michael Rayner

Sir: In response to David Rendel's article concerning the Newbury bypass (Another View, 7 July), I am keen to address his remarks about the insignificant nature of the destruction to the battlefield of the First Battle of Newbury (1843) from the new road, if built.

Mr Rendel appears to think that as parts of the battlefield have already been built over, there is no point in saving the rest of the site. But very few English battlefields exist in their original state at the time of the action. According to Mr Rendel's argument, there would be no point in preserving any of these sites. This is a terribly short-sighted and damaging view to take, as our battlefields provide us with an invaluable historical source that can be used to aid interpretation and understanding of a particular engagement.

In addition they provide excellent educational opportunities and, if presented sympathetically, a tourism resource. Moreover, these sites are the places where our history was decided and our ancestors fought and died. To think that such places of historic interest and importance can be built on or transected by roads, with no regard for their worth, is a disgrace. This country should take pride in its heritage, rather than exchange it for short-term gains and profit, especially when, as in the case of Newbury, other alternatives exist.

Only a month ago, English Heritage published the Battlefields Register, which includes the First Battle of Newbury. Sites were not included lightly, as it was realised that each battlefield's importance and boundaries would have to be absolutely clear, so that if the need arose they could be supported and argued in any public enquiry or court of law. Such a situation has now arrived at Newbury, and one can only hope that English Heritage will now add its voice to defend the site of the First Battle of Newbury from partial destruction.

Yours,

Michael Rayner

Coordinator

The Battlefields Trust

Walkley, Sheffield

13 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in