LETTER: Operatic costs, funding and audiences
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Professor Arthur Jacobs
Sir: Those of us who write about and teach the history of music are grateful for your editorial revelation that "opera started as a commercial mass entertainment in central Europe's concert halls".
Hitherto we have traced opera's origins to early 17th-century Florence and its "essentially courtly entertainments in the form of the then fashionable pastorale ... for the delectation of aristocratic spectators" (Groves Dictionary of Music and Musicians, current edition).
We have chronicled the long dependence of operatic performance on financial subsidy from aristocratic, state or municipal sources. Somehow we missed its genesis in the concert hall, whether in central Europe or elsewhere, and failed to identify it as a mass entertainment before the 19th century.
Yours faithfully,
Arthur Jacobs
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments