Letter: Open government in Bahrain

Mr Hugh Tunnell
Tuesday 20 February 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Hugh Tunnell

Sir: Robert Fisk's series of articles on Bahrain are so unbalanced that the casual reader might suppose the country to be in a state of insurrection. This is far from being the case.

Bahrain, a good friend of the West, has a history of tolerance, education and cosmopolitanism. It is acknowledged to be a regional leader in such areas as women's emancipation, education and care of the disabled. To describe the Bahraini government, as Mr Fisk does, as the most repressive in the Gulf ignores the facts of geography and history.

Any visitor to Bahrain, not to mention the 7,500-strong British community there, will readily testify that this is no police state. And to devote an article ("Qatar's freedoms put Bahrain on the spot", 15 February) to Qatari attitudes to Bahrain, while failing to mention the territorial dispute between the two countries, is disingenuous, to say the least.

Every country has its problems. In Bahrain, these include unemployment, which the government is tackling vigorously, and a shortage of funds to prime employment-producing projects. Oil wealth is not what it was. As to greater popular representation, the government has made it clear that gradual evolution in this direction is on the cards but not in response to the use or threat of force.

Mr Fisk would acknowledge that, for at least some of his interlocutors, the aim is an Islamic state. I submit that such an outcome, however unlikely, would be inimical to the interests of the vast majority of Bahrainis.

The whole question of popular representation in a Gulf Arab society is very complex .Meanwhile, Sheikh Isa is the most accessible of rulers, with an open Majlis for the citizens twice a week.

Yours faithfully,

Hugh Tunnell

London, SW6

The writer was British Ambassador to Bahrain, 1992-1995.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in