Letter: On trial for rape
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I am appalled by Jack Straw's proposal to the Police Federation that a man accused of rape should be barred from personally cross- examining his accusers ("Rapists will lose right to quiz victims", 21 May).
The most basic principle of English law is that a man is innocent until proved guilty. This proposal stands that principle on its head. It assumes that any man on trial for rape is guilty and therefore ineligible to cross- examine the woman accusing him.
Those accused of rape should have the same rights of cross- examination available to those accused of any other crime. Mr Straw's proposals are an abuse of civil rights.
JAMES G FLUSS
London NW4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments