Letter: Older pregnancies: proceed with care

Professor Brenda Almond
Tuesday 06 June 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Polly Toynbee's article on older women bearing children ("A wrinkled, saggy woman carrying a foetus? Yuk", 3 June) was couched entirely in terms of physical distaste and prejudice. But I wonder if it was based on a misunderstanding of what is involved? It would be a real breakthrough if science could now make postmenopausal women fertile, but despite the term "fertility treatment", this is not what has been achieved.

What science can do is to enable a woman to bear a child from an egg which has been donated and transferred from another woman. And since this is so, it is very reasonable that the donor, or society in general, should take as much interest in the child's point of view as it does in the case of adoption. Women are encouraged to donate - not an easy or risk-free process - because they understand the pain of childlessness, and imagine a loving long-term family setting for what is biologically their own son or daughter. In practice, eggs are at a premium and in some parts of the world it is money that will determine who gets them. Here I would suggest we are entitled to proceed with caution and, as with so many other things in health care, it is a matter of priorities.

As for the gender equality argument, well, the fact is men do remain genuinely fertile into old age, and so far we just have to accept the fact that women do not.

Yours,

BRENDA ALMOND

Department of Philosophy

University of Hull

Hull

5 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in