Letter: Obsolete rights
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Robert Armstrong
Sir: In seeking to promote the European Convention of Human Rights as a halfway house to a full-scale UK Bill of Rights, John Wadham of Liberty (Letters, 21 February) inadvertently exposes the fatal flaw common in all such documents.
The European version, he complains, has nothing in it about information from public bodies or immigration. Of course not. The convention was drawn up in the late Forties and early Fifties. Mistakes are made, matters are left out, because they do not seem important at the time. But Bills of Rights take on a special aura, almost become holy writ, and are therefore difficult to amend or improve.
If Mr Wadham has his way and there is a UK Bill of Rights, it will also become obsolete in 10, 20, 50 years' time. Far better to have Acts of Parliament granting specific rights - freedom of information, for example - which can be amended or replaced as circumstances require.
Yours faithfully,
Robert Armstrong
Bromley, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments