Letter: Obscure to some, admired by others
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CONGRATULATIONS to the School Examinations and Assessment Council for including A S J Tessimond, Patricia Pogson and Samuel Selvon in their list of authors whose books 14-year-olds might reasonably be expected (with the guidance of an attentive teacher) to have read. None of the writers strikes me as 'obscure' especially not Tessimond, whose poem 'Cats' must be one of the most anthologised pieces this century. However, if you use The Oxford Companion to English Literature as your yardstick to quality or fame, you are in deep trouble. Distinguished contemporaries it ignores include Douglas Dunn, Christopher Logue, Hugo Williams, Michael Horovitz and Julian Symons. Does this make them 'obscure'?
Philip Oakes
Market Rasen, Lincolnshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments