Letter: O for one scholar to leaven all the poets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is not too clear from Sandra Barwick's entertaining article on the Oxford poetry professorship ('A city of rhyme and treason', 30 April) that it doesn't strictly have to be a poet who is elected to the post. Several excellent poets have been chosen since the late Enid Starkie inaugurated the custom of campaigning for poet candidates from outside in 1950 (she organised C. Day Lewis's famous victory). But sometimes excellent scholars have still carried the day.
In the past, at different times, Oxford MAs have had the option of voting for scholars such as Peter Levi (also a poet) and John Jones, both of whom were elected; or for C. S. Lewis, F. R. Leavis and Enid Starkie herself, all of whom were declined. In this year's election, no eminent academic, from Oxford or anywhere else, has come forward.
It's probably heresy for a poet to say this, but in one way this is a pity. Should not poets have to take their chance against substantial academic candidates, allowing MAs to debate and decide whether - considering the talent on offer - a good teacher and communicator might not be a more useful gift to the university than a practitioner?
In another way, of course, it is an advantage this time that the scales are not naturally weighted in favour of a familiar candidate from the university.
On one sad occasion in the past, loyalty to the known local figure and unfamiliarity with the outsider led to the rejection of the late Robert Lowell, whose high talents as poet and teacher amply qualified him for the honour of the professorship.
Yours sincerely,
ALAN BROWNJOHN
London, NW3
30 April
The writer is a candidate for Oxford Professor of Poetry.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments