Letter:Nudes in public places are spiritually uplifting
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Professor D. J. Naismith Sir: Having been responsible for the selection of paintings to adorn the walls of an all-science college in London University, I was dismayed to read ("PC activists confront naked truth", 8 February) that paintings were to be removed on the grounds of political correctness from the walls of the University of Southampton.
Political correctness in the arts is an intriguing and disturbing phenomenon. I wondered whether Maia ni Bhrolchain's problem with objectification applied solely to women (was not Adam also objectified in Larry Wakefield's urban landscape?) or to nude women. Would neither of Goya's Mahas be acceptable in the conference room of the social sciences department?
As a biological scientist, I also wonder whether political correctness shows equal concern for other life forms. Are not George Stubbs' noble beasts and George de la Tour's magnificent flowers, fruits and vegetables also objectified? All figurative painting is basically objectification - an arrangement of forms. Should the work also have a "meaning" (that elusive element so sought after in non-figurative painting), or reveal an attitude on the part of the artist worthy of approbation or contempt, then it is arguably a more interesting painting.
The opportunity to appreciate the beauty of a formal composition and to confront creative genius is surely more important, even to students of social statistics, than the rigid observation of political dogma. Have we forgotten the purges of the arts, in the name of political correctness, in Stalin's Soviet Union and Hitler's Third Reich?
Yours faithfully, D. J. Naismith King's College, London London, W8
9 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments