LETTER: Nuclear threat still looms
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Professor John Ziman, FRS
Sir: The decision to extend the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) indefinitely, taken by more than 170 states in New York this week ("Treaty bans spread of nuclear arms for ever", 12 May) is the correct one.
Not only does it outlaw the spread of nuclear weapons in perpetuity, it also creates the "best possible framework for further progress towards the disarmament goals of the Treaty", according to the UK's conference position paper.
However, this is no time to be complacent. Preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons - and other weapons of mass destruction - requires constant vigilance and effort. For example, we need a more effective and better-resourced International Atomic Energy Agency. Is the current annual budget of about $200m really sufficient for the NPT's watchdog? Can Britain afford more than its present contribution of £8m?
Nor can we allow the arms reduction process to slacken. The nuclear weapon powers have agreed to "progressive and systematic" efforts to achieve complete nuclear disarmament. A strengthened NPT review process will monitor and assess progress towards that goal - preparatory meetings in each of the three years preceding a five-yearly review conference.
Britain need not regard this prospect with trepidation. Over recent weeks the British government has made a number of steps in the direction of nuclear restraint and disarmament. It is worth maintaining that momentum, rather than falling to any possible temptation to use one successful conference as an excuse to rest on one's laurels.
Indefinite extension of the NPT was secured in the expectation that nuclear disarmament will now be pursued with determination. If that expectation subsequently proves to be unfulfilled, the treaty's future could still be in doubt.
Yours faithfully,
JOHN ZIMAN
Chairman
International Security
Information Service
London, WC2
12 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments