LETTER : Nuclear tests: France accused
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Janet Bloomfield
Sir: So President Jacques Chirac has ignored the massive opposition in Britain and around the world to French nuclear testing in the South Pacific. The French government is guilty of duplicity over its claim that nuclear tests in the Pacific are aimed at maintaining the "safety" of its existing nuclear stockpile.
When France agreed to extend the non-proliferation treaty, it pledged to exercise "utmost restraint" with regard to nuclear testing and also pledged to help the world to pursue the complete elimination of nuclear weapons.
However the present series of tests is designed to help France to develop a new generation of "smart nukes" specifically suited to combat situations. The new warheads France is hoping to develop are tactical systems equipped with a "stealth" capability not dissimilar to that of the B-1 bomber, and with the ability to burrow deep into the ground.
This is not only provocative in the extreme, it sends dangerous signals to other would-be nuclear powers, and may eventually prompt a new nuclear arms race potentially more dangerous than the Cold War. The long-term environmental and geological dangers of carrying out further tests in this area can only be speculated on.
Yours sincerely,
Janet Bloomfield
Chair
CND
London, N7
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments