Letter: Nuclear review
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article "Forces in revolt over cost-cutting review" (22 January) gave details of a Ministry of Defence document which revealed fragile morale in the military and a desire for more resources to be directed towards improved working conditions.
This follows the recent revelation in the House of Lords that the yearly running cost for Britain's nuclear weapons system is not pounds 200m, as both the Tory government and to date the Labour government have always claimed, but a whacking pounds 940m every year. CND believes the true cost is even higher - closer to pounds 1,500m a year.
A large part of this would be saved if Trident were taken off high alert status. Even more would be saved if our nuclear weapons system were completely abandoned. Surely here we have a solution to the Government's dilemma. They should at least listen to the advice coming from former military leaders who are now free to express their opinions - such as Lord Carver and Lord Bramall, and General Lee Butler in the United States - and start to get rid of nuclear weapons.
I'm sure that the military personnel referred to in the report would be more than happy to give some ideas on other ways the money could be spent.
DAVE KNIGHT
Chair, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
London N7
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments