Letter: Nuclear Future

Ken Coates Mep
Wednesday 17 December 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The Prime Minister's announcement of extended coal supply arrangements after 31 March 1998 raises more questions than it answers ("Generators deal gives pits six-month stay of execution", 11 December).

The three-month extension to 30 June 1998 has caused uncertainty among many miners. I am receiving numerous inquiries from men who are very worried that this jeopardises their entitlement to enhanced redundancy payments worth up to pounds 27,000. Salaried employees might have expected considerably more.

The fear is that this short extension to June will result simply in a delay in the declaration of redundancies until after the date when entitlement to enhanced severance pay has lapsed. When the coal industry was privatised in 1994, previously discretionary redundancy terms in the industry became the subject of a formal contract. This is due to expire at the end of March 1998, simultaneously with the coal supply contracts.

As things are, the extension of the miners' employment could mean that they earn substantially less than they will lose by forfeiting the entitlement to appropriate compensation for the loss of their jobs.

Ken Coates MEP

(Nottinghamshire North and Chesterfield, Lab)

Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in