Letter: Now for the good news on software
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article on computer software paints much too bleak a picture ('When fingers are burnt on computer keyboards', 8 July). It is certainly now possible to produce large software systems which are delivered on time, within budget, and which are highly reliable and meet the users' needs. We know a great deal about how to do this - for example, by using mature, well-understood software engineering processes, by involving the user closely in the requirements definition, and by using the appropriate engineering technology.
Many of these advances have been pioneered in UK universities; many current research programmes are aiming to improve further our software engineering capabilities. In industry, most of the expenditure on software is consumed not in the initial production of the software, but in subsequent maintenance, which is the evolution of the software to meet changing user requirements. Again we know how to do this.
Of course, it is much cheaper to produce bad rather than good, well-engineered and maintainable software, and competitive tendering which considers only price will inevitably lead to problems. Such short-term cost savings will also lead to huge maintenance bills later on. So we should not be prepared to accept the folklore that software projects cannot deliver. We certainly have the engineering capability, but you get what you pay for.
Yours faithfully,
K. H. BENNETT
Centre for Software Maintenance,
Computer Science Department
University of Durham
Durham
8 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments