Letter: Not the mind of a killer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IN "THE Executioner's Tale" (Review, 23 August). Dorothy Otnow Lewis diagnoses her interviewee, Deep South part-time executioner Bob Smith, as "psychotic" because of his "contradictions". I suggest that these disappear on closer analysis. For example, Smith (on his childhood): "...we had to knock on doors for food"; later: "We had to go where there was work". Lewis: "Did you have enough to eat?" Smith: "Yes". My analysis: a) so knocking on doors worked; b) as an itinerant construction worker, Smith's father could provide for his family when in work and be in trouble when out of it - like millions pre-welfare. In her eagerness to find contradictions, Lewis reveals her inability to empathise - the product, no doubt, of a privileged childhood. No consistency - just the rough and smooth of the underprivileged.
Bob Smith may have many unlikeable qualities, but he has a useful main job (as an electrician) and his brushes with the law have not been serious enough to prevent his other, state employment. He had a disrupted and violent childhood, but is a welcomed guest at his sister's and close to his grandson.
Lewis may have 25 years' experience of interviewing and treating murderers. But she reveals herself as out of her depth - and out of touch - in dealing with a man who is deeply flawed, is not a criminal and performs a distasteful part-time job as a legally sanctioned instrument of a democratically constituted administration. Smith deserves better than the label slapped on him by Lewis in a display of confused thinking, contrasting markedly with the way in which, with far fewer educational advantages, he attempts to explain himself.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments