Letter: No restrictions on freedom of expression in Peru
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: John Simpson's lack of knowledge about the Peruvian situation is once again very obvious in his letter 'How Peru threatens a brave journalist' (31 March).
On 25 March, Mr Genaro Delgado Parker, chairman of the Association of Radio and Television, clearly stated that during the past two and a half years of government in Peru 'there has not been any restriction to the right of the freedom of expression in Peru'.
On 30 March, Mr Miguel Angel Calderon, dean of the Peruvian Journalists' Association, following a meeting with President Fujimori, expressed his conviction that in our country exists an unrestricted freedom of expression. Moreover, during the above-mentioned meeting, some cases that worried the Journalists' Association were mentioned to the President, Miss Valenzuela's not being one of them.
Even more so, President Fujimori himself has expressed (to give one example of his commitment to the guarantee of freedom of expression in Peru) that in his opinion two journalists, Magno Sosa and Danilo Quijano, were entirely innocent of the charges made against them. Nevertheless, as is obvious, it is in the Court of Justice where those situations will be resolved and not, as Mr Simpson suggests, through 'persecution and violence' instigated by the government.
We knew that before his trip to Peru in September 1992, Mr Simpson was absolutely convinced that our country was a 'Heart of Darkness', as he wrote in the Independent on Sunday (6 September, 1992); his subsequent 'reports' on Newsnight being an accurate reflection of his theory. Today, notwithstanding the undeniable changes and progress achieved by Peru, including our return to democracy and reinstatement into the international financial system, he insists on casting doubts upon our basic institutions by making these hasty and groundless accusations.
Yours faithfully,
JULIO FLORIAN
Minister Counsellor
Embassy of Peru
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments