Letter: No prizes for catch-22 diplomacy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IN ITS deliberation as to whether a peace prize might be appropriate ('A good guy once again', 9 May) in the context of any Bosnian 'peace plan', the Nobel committee might consider the following.
That David Owen has consistently maintained that the Vance- Owen Plan represented the best possible option for the former Yugoslavia in the absence of a willingness of the outside world to intervene militarily. Yet, simultaneously, the reason most commonly cited by Europe for not intervening militarily has been in order not to pre-empt these often Byzantine negotiations. Meanwhile the critical element for the survival of the Muslim community - time - has been squandered.
European policy throughout this shameful episode has been characterised by a convenient double-think typified by this 'catch-22' diplomacy. This approach is also apparent in the introduction of peace-keeping forces, which has effectively prevented a meaningful military intervention and reduced the unfortunate soldiers on the ground to helpless observers of 'ethnic cleansing'.
Meanwhile the 'peace process' is also responsible for an arms embargo which perpetuates a gross imbalance of forces at the expense of the Muslims, surely the most politically isolated and vulnerable population in Europe.
Whatever settlement that is achieved could not possibly be considered a success for European diplomacy, now the object of worldwide contempt and ridicule. A 'peace prize' would only serve to disguise a diplomatic and political failure of catastrophic proportions and put the seal on our hypocrisy.
Peter Walsh
Co Wicklow, Ireland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments