Letter: No alternative to nuclear power
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The campaign director of Greenpeace (letter, 10 October) is right in ridiculing the nuclear industry's sanitising zeal to remove the word 'windscale' from the vocabulary, but she is wrong when she objects to the use of 'recycling' to denote the process that makes the material of spent fuel rods re-usable. On the other hand, her use of 'recycling' in connection with combined heat and power shows a regrettable lack of understanding of thermodynamics: CHP does not recycle waste heat but uses it.
Yours faithfully,
NICHOLAS KURTI
Department of Engineering
Science
University of Oxford
Oxford
10 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments