Letter: New life after Crown service

John Horam,Mp
Thursday 14 September 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr John Horam, MP

Sir: I am sorry that your Westminster correspondent, Chris Blackhurst, has drawn some incorrect conclusions from the figures I gave Alan Milburn, MP, in reply to this question about the behavioural conditions imposed on former civil servants under the business appointments rules ("Staff exodus stripping Whitehall of knowledge", 9 September).

Behavioural conditions, which restrict for a period what a former civil servant may do for a new employer, do not tell the whole story; waiting periods are also used.

For the record, in 1994-95, 38 waiting periods were imposed, as well as the 49 behavioural conditions quoted by Mr Blackhurst. This means that 14 per cent of applications in 1994-95 attracted a waiting period or a behavioural condition. I think this is realistic.

The business appointment rules are not meant to stop Crown servants taking up jobs in the private sector. They strike a balance between the freedom of individuals to take up any employment they choose and the avoidance of any suspicion of impropriety.

Applications, which are often made some months after people leave Crown service, are considered individually and on their merits. The presumption that most applications will be approved unconditionally is actually written into the rules.

As for stripping Whitehall of knowledge, many of the applications are made by civil servants who are on the point of retirement or who have already retired. Although the Government may have lost its knowledge, I am gratified to know that the economy continues to benefit from its expertise.

Yours,

John Horam

Parliamentary Secretary

Office of Public Service

Cabinet Office

London, SW1

14 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in