Letter: Need should not be the sole criterion for gun ownership
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The failure of the government to take any steps towards tightening gun laws in the wake of the Dunblane slaughter is yet another example of the amnesia and fatal complacency which is undermining British democracy. The Australian government at least reacted promptly and decisively following the devastating events at Port Arthur.
Since when is it the business of responsible government to safeguard the interests of a sporting minority at the expense of the lives of the majority? I am sure there are sensible shooters out there but hand guns are always and only lethal weapons; the law should not offer absolute sanction to those few who use them and so create opportunities for their violent misuse. Gun laws should never be based on the notion of individual rights; they remain an issue of collective responsibility.
RUTH LITTLE
London SW11
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments