Letter: Need for public code of ethics

Ms Elizabeth Symons
Sunday 20 February 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Surely the obvious conclusion to be drawn from the reactions to the evidence given by Sir Robin Butler to the Scott inquiry (Letters, 15 February) is that the whole process of giving advice to ministers, and indeed the relationship between government ministers and civil servants, needs to be more open and clearly understood.

The relationship is subject to a series of different codes and authorities, and is from time to time modified by the individual pronouncements of the prime minister as the minister for the civil service, or the head of the civil service. What is glaringly apparent is that while many experts may believe that they have grasped the principles upon which the relationship is conducted, their understanding of the position is often contradictory, and their explanations obscure.

Most backbench MPs simply do not have a clue how the relationship does work, or how it ought to work. If our MPs do not understand the position, how can individual members of the public be expected to do so?

The obvious conclusion is that there should be a clear code of practice, or ethics, which governs the relationship of government ministers and civil servants. This should be a public document, placed firmly in the public arena, and open to public comment.

Yours sincerely,

ELIZABETH SYMONS

General Secretary

Association of First Division

Civil Servants

London, SW1

18 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in