Letter:Navy can do job of royal yacht

John E. Tricks
Tuesday 28 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The politicians' attempt to make political capital from linking the future of the royal yacht to the Queen's personal prestige and popularity can only harm the sense of national cohesion that must be the foundation of the monarchy itself (report, 23 January).

The Royal Family travels by air. Most major cities they visit have British and Commonwealth embassies with acceptable standards of communications, security and comfort. The larger Royal Naval warships are capable of providing the same in more remote locations, albeit on a temporary basis for a smaller entourage.

Royal Naval ships already routinely host receptions for local dignitaries and British expatriates. I recall an admiral and his wife entertaining a Malaysian sultan and his retinue offshore, with dignified hospitality that attracted much favourable comment at minimum expense to the UK taxpayer.

If politicians' motives are genuinely about replacing the royal yacht for the benefit of the Queen rather than their own election chances, they should postpone a decision until after the election.

JOHN E TRICKS

Cheriton Fitzpaine, Devon

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in