Letter: National Science Week: was it empty rhetoric or a cause for celebration?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It may be National Science Week, but there is little cause for celebration at the scientific research agencies of the Department of Trade and Industry. The department continues to cut expenditure on scientific research and the threat of privatisation or closure is hanging over the National Physical Laboratory, the Laboratory of the Government Chemists, the National Weights and Measures Laboratory, and the National Engineering Laboratory. The DTI's fifth laboratory, Warren Spring, is due to close next week with a loss of 200 jobs in environmental science.
William Waldegrave's science White Paper has initiated a further review of government research establishments, concentrating on privatisation and rationalisation, with the aim of reducing government expenditure rather than increasing the effectiveness of British science.
Ministers seem to have little understanding of the worth of scientific research. They do not appear to appreciate that the accumulated knowledge of the workforce, properly utilised, is of far greater benefit to the nation than the immediate realisation of assets such as buildings and land.
Government research laboratories were set up to conduct research for the public good which would not otherwise be carried out by industry or universities. This research - for example, in measurement, safety and environmental standards - is more important than ever, due to the increasingly technical complexity of life and the increasing need for global harmonisation. Until the Government reverses its policy of cutting research funding, and gives up its dogma of privatising its laboratories, the science community will see Mr Waldegrave's enthusiasm for initiatives such as National Science Week as empty rhetoric.
Yours sincerely,
ANTHONY MANSFIELD
Institution of Professionals, Managers and Specialists
National Physical Laboratory
Teddington, Middlesex
25 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments