Letter: Myth of magic index for house prices
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: May we attempt to hold the ring between David Gilchrist (letter, 10 June) and Yolande Barnes (letter, 17 June) on the subject of residential property prices?
Mr Gilchrist was correct to be critical of the use of anecdotal evidence to question the figures from the Halifax Building Society, based on a sample of some 12,000 transactions. Ms Barnes was right to point out that the omission of cash purchases can clealy bias an index which purports to cover all properties (although our estimate for the most recent 12 months was 17 per cent, rather than the 28 per cent quoted by Ms Barnes).
The compilation of price indices are useful for professionals to look ahead to the kinds of money they will be asked to provide (in the case of lenders) and the orders of revenue they may expect to receive (where these are on a commission basis). They are of no value to the individual buying or selling a property. The hundreds of thousands of properties on the market at any one time comprise an enormous range of qualities, the values of which can only be determined between a buyer who is interested in the property and a seller who is interested in the offer. Small percentage changes from month to month in any index have little bearing on this situation.
Yours sincerely,
TINA NEWPORT
Director
James R. Adams & Associates
London, WC2
20 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments